Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pattaravut Samutnavee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:20, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pattaravut Samutnavee[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a Thai voice actor. Declined at AFC but moved to draft space, sourced only to YouTube, Muggle and a fan site. Complete lack of in-depth coverage in RIS. There may be other sources in Thai that I can’t find, but unless notability can be clearly shown it should be sent back to draft for further work as it is not ready for mainspace. Mccapra (talk) 06:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 06:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 06:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The two reliable sources that I found are a video interview by news website The Matter[1] and a 2004 interview from the the Animag magazine, reproduced in this Facebook page[2]. They don't contain much in-depth profile content that's presented in the authors' own voice (just examples of his previous work). There appears to be a small active fan community dedicated to Thai anime voice actors, but not much in-depth original material seems available online. The Thai Wikipedia cites an interview from a 2010 issue of Zenshu magazine. Given the range of coverage, it's plausible there may be more offline sources. --Paul_012 (talk) 06:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 09:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.