Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patsy van Ettinger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Patsy van Ettinger[edit]

Patsy van Ettinger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub Correctron (talk) 05:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep stub is not a valid reason for deletion, there are many stubs on very notable subjects, she has a cult following, sources needed Atlantic306 (talk) 08:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There's nothing on the page. No sources or anything. Is there any proof she's notable?Correctron (talk) 00:44, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:00, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Other than the fact that there is no source other than IMDB, she is only "known" for having a very minor role in a small-budget project of two movies. JTtheOG (talk) 22:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:01, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per JTtheOG. No clear claim to notability has been established. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:01, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete But not for reason editor proposing deletion has mentioned ("Stub" was all s/he wrote). This is an actress who's had a few minor roles in some very minor movies. Doesn't satisfy GNG. Tigercompanion25 (talk) 04:26, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete - non-notable. Blythwood (talk) 17:26, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.