Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patsy O'Connor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎ per Fermiboson's apparent withdrawal. (non-admin closure) Schminnte ^{[talk to me]} 16:57, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Patsy O'Connor[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails NACTOR. Previously deleted as expired BLPPROD. No secondary sources could be found. Fermiboson (talk) 01:35, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and United States of America. Fermiboson (talk) 01:35, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, New Jersey, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:30, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:NACTOR based on roles in current article (eg. It Ain't Hay and You're a Lucky Fellow, Mr. Smith), and was verifiably a well-known vaudeville (stage) performer at a young age as well. While we'll definitely find more offline, there are sufficient secondary sources online to use the presumption of notability from NACTOR. Eg. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] —siro χ o 05:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've begun working on the article, and I think with the sources I listed above we also have WP:BASIC —siro χ o 06:12, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Additions of multiple reliable sources by Siroxo demonstrates notability. --Grnrchst (talk) 08:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Sources are in place to demonstrate notability. She is also linked in numerous Wikipedia articles. Rublamb (talk) 17:32, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:NACTOR guide Lightburst (talk) 00:46, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The page has been vastly improved by Siroxo and Rublamb, so that notability according to Wikipedia guidelines seems more than fairly established. Thank you.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:52, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY. The sources on the page which have been kindly added show clear notability. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with an admin speedily closing as keep, if they wish to do so. Fermiboson (talk) 22:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Fully sourced at this point, can't see any reason to delete. Thief-River-Faller (talk) 22:45, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.