Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Seaman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedily deleted by Rory096 and userfied by Quentin Smith. (aeropagitica) (talk) 20:59, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Patrick Seaman[edit]
Userfy or Delete. Autobiographical, and despite claims does not seem to meet WP:BIO notability requirements. The two companies mentioned do not appear to meet WP:CORP. Google searches return few [1] [2] to no [3] hits about the claimed inventions, which makes notability questionable. lowercase 06:09, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- When a page on "Patrick Seaman" is created by [email protected] (talk · contribs), one understandably becomes suspicious. Delete for failing to meet WP:BIO. --Calton | Talk 06:42, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment References for the inventions claimed in the article should be provided as a minimum. Author should also read WP:AUTO and WP:VANITY as a guide to autobiographical articles, too. (aeropagitica) (talk) 06:56, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not notable. Perhaps userfy too. DarthVader 08:53, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment — Why has this page already been deleted when it's still up for AfD? Just wondering. — RJH (talk) 17:09, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment — It was moved to User:[email protected], and the resulting redirect was speedy-deleted. I think this should be closed as Userfied. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 19:08, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.