Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Mcbean

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:18, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Mcbean[edit]

Hoax - zero ghits Kernel Saunters 18:41, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This seems to be some sort of vanity page. --Jacques Pirat ^Talk 21:13, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Vanity or hoax? I lean toward hoax after some checking. It doesn't appear to be verifiable. --Stormbay 21:46, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Obvious hoax - the last tram (note spelling) in Edinburgh ran in 1956. Tevildo 22:21, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Few other things that don't read true: There is no Private First Class rank in the British Army and the line "Patrick McBean joined the Black Watch after serving in the British Army" is a bit odd as the Black Watch is part of the British Army. FlowerpotmaN (t · c) 23:39, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have put a Speedy nonsense tag on it. There is nothing true in the article. Check [1] for proof that he was never head of the McBean clan. SilkTork 23:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since unsourced and very dubious. However, this isn't really a speedy candidate as the text is clearly coherent. I wouldn't mind closing this early but let's let the AfD go a bit longer than a few hours. Pascal.Tesson 00:05, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hoax, not verifiable. Culnacréann 00:16, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this sickening hoax. The two Black Watch VC winners were: Corporal John Ripley, 1st Battalion, The Black Watch (Royal Highlanders) in 1915 and Lance Corporal David Finlay, 2nd Battalion, The Black Watch (Royal Highlanders)also in 1915. Bigdaddy1981 00:49, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hoax. Maxa megalon 2000 05:08, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete as per above. Bearian 20:52, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.