Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick McGrath (ice hockey)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 04:29, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick McGrath (ice hockey)[edit]

Patrick McGrath (ice hockey) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 07:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:17, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 16:12, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:18, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails to meet NHOCKEY and I don't see anything to meet GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 12:02, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Short career for a non-notable mid-minors player. When the only source purportedly supporting notability given in the article is a blog attached to the subject's hometown (and small-town) newspaper, that surely doesn't clear WP:ROUTINE. Ravenswing 13:04, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.