Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Gamble (footballer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Gamble (footballer)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 22:04, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 22:04, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 22:04, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 22:04, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, has significant coverage already after pro contract and debut, with 2+ sources that pass GNG. You can find more of his coverage in Lancashire Telegraph here.--Ortizesp (talk) 19:58, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftifty - WP:TOOSOON, and does not pass WP:GNG. This is WP:ROUTINE coverage of his signing a pro contract, and this offers some significant coverage not enough to pass GNG. He will likely be notable in the future but not as of now, so I suggest draftifying and moving back to namespace when more articles surface once he makes more appearances. Paul Vaurie (talk) 17:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:38, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify as above. Giant Snowman 20:43, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:31, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per Ortizesp. Young player with ongoing career in pro team with many sources already. THanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 19:11, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify, sources above are not close to establishing GNG.

JoelleJay (talk) 00:32, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify young player who could become notable but currently does not pass WP:GNG. Paul Vaurie's second source is borderline SIGCOV as it has some non-routine, non-interview content. However that alone is not enough to pass GNG. The rest of the sources here and in the article are WP:ROUTINE transfer announcements, match reports, stats, etc. Willing to reconsider my !vote if more sources are brought up, so please ping me. Frank Anchor 13:05, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.