Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Van Pelt Watkins
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Chicago mayoral election, 2011. Tone 13:46, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Patricia Van Pelt Watkins[edit]
- Patricia Van Pelt Watkins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN as a failed candidate who hasn't held office, doesn't otherwise meet WP:GNG – Muboshgu (talk) 17:39, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete She got a bit coverage during the election because she was one of six people on the ballot and was insulted by Moseley Braun, but what I've read is not sufficient imo. Hekerui (talk) 21:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete An unsuccessful political candidate with no other plausible claim of notability. Cullen328 (talk) 04:11, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: 5th place with 9,604 votes in a local election. No evidence of meeting WP:POLITICIAN or anything else. --Closeapple (talk) 04:19, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Chicago mayoral election, 2011. Plausible search term, and WP:POLITICIAN is pretty clear on things like this. RayTalk 15:54, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.