Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Bizzell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 16:07, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Patricia Bizzell[edit]
non-notable teacher. Nekohakase 15:21, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unless her Rhetoric text is widely regarded as a classic, she fails WP:PROF. (Still better than a witch.) Leibniz 15:42, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep she has written a book and her research is noteworthy also.Igbogirl 02:34, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete She EDITED a book of historical writings and no references are given for her other research.Vic sinclair 07:28, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep based on a myriad of Ghits some of which feel notable. It may just be a niche topic and thus notabiity may be much more solid than I can see. Fiddle Faddle 15:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- DEFINITE KEEP. I added a ton of stuff from her CV. She definitely qualifies as notable. Now the article needs major cleanup, not deletion. RickReinckens 05:01, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.