Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrice Lovely

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that the subject meets notability standards. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:04, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Patrice Lovely[edit]

Patrice Lovely (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still seems questionable at best because although she only has one major work as Hattie and my searches have found several news so far at News, Books, browsers and Highbeam, she's still questionable for her own solidly independently notable article and this would perhaps best redirected to Love Thy Neighbor after deleting, since this seems to the best known work. SwisterTwister talk 19:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep This person appears to clear WP:GNG, with 1, 2, 3. There is an additional source I cannot show here from the examiner that appears to be blacklisted, presumably because of some of their dubious practices vis-a-vis copyright; but I think it should count towards notability. These sources appear to mention her work beyond just "Love Thy Neighbor", and so I don't believe a redirect there would be appropriate. This might remain a stub for a while, but there's nothing wrong with that in principle. Vanamonde93 (talk) 22:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:54, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:22, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Music1201 talk 05:50, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as seems to have generated coverage for WP:BASIC to be met, the article can be improved with the use of the sources. Atlantic306 (talk) 20:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep passes NACTOR with multiple roles in Tyler Perry works. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 23:55, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.