Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patient ombudsman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 16:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Patient ombudsman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia isn't a newspaper. I dream of horses (T) @ 20:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 08:14, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe delete for now unless it can actually be mentioned elsewhere as my searches found the expected news sources here and here. SwisterTwister talk 05:11, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 06:07, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:31, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question The Patient ombudsman for the Province of Ontario is not notable? Wikipedia is not a newspaper? — Someone please help me out here: what do those pronouncement have to do with the proposed deletion of this article? Ottawahitech (talk) 10:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This needs better coverage for a better article as there's currently not much. SwisterTwister talk 16:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG. Searches didn't turn up anything to show differently. Perhaps Userfy if the editor is willing to work on sourcing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:00, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.