Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patiala Airport

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:40, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Patiala Airport[edit]

Patiala Airport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolute no notability, no sources ref's provided.Can be saved if proper sources/ref's are provided. Bingobro (Chat) 16:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:05, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:05, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete, on the basis there seems to be very little to say, it is a small airport that doesn't have commercial (public) flights. Clearly any airport that has fare paying passengers is going to be notable. Unless someone can demonstrate that Pataila Airport is important for some reason, I'd say this article won't be missed. Sionk (talk) 22:12, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. While the article does require improvement, AfD is not for cleanup, and editors are reminded that with the exception of BLPs, sources do not have to be in an article for it to be kept, they merely have to exist. Furthermore, it is general, long-standing consensus that public-use airports are inherently notable, as part of Wikipedia's function as a gazetteer, and given the location of this airport WP:CSB must be borne in mind as well. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Is it public use? I got the impression it wasn't, for example this wiki-ish listing says it was a private airport but is now a civil airport used by a flying school and a college. Sionk (talk) 00:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A "civil airport" is another term for a public-use airport, so it does sound like it. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as this airport has been used by a flying club[1] (at least recently) and also has a regional DGCA office.[2]. It also has an aircaft engineering college[3].:--DreamLinker (talk) 13:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "LIST OF DGCA APPROVED FLYING TRAINING ORGANISATIONS as on 10/06/2016" (PDF). DGCA. Retrieved 11 November 2017.
  2. ^ "DGCA Offices". www.dgca.gov.in. Retrieved 11 November 2017.
  3. ^ "LIST OF DGCA APPROVED AME TRAINING INSTITUTES" (PDF). DGCA. Retrieved 11 November 2017.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.