Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paten Hughes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:06, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paten Hughes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

General lack of notability. The subject of the article is marginally notable primarily for videos uploaded to Vimeo which discuss her growing tomatoes. Article was created as PR. COI issue; WP:COIN#Paten Hughes. John Nagle (talk) 03:55, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I'd thought about speedying this, but it didn't quite meet the criteria Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - can't quite see the claim to notability - is it the tomato video? Smallbones_(smalltalk) 20:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This is a marginal case of notability, but it is still notability. In addition to the citations in the article I found this (although I couldn't find the editorial policy, so am unsure it is a RS); this on KABC; this from A+; while this from Glamour, is whimsical, it does point to that fact that she is publicly notable; andthis features her, and is more than a trivial mention. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:05, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I looked at the sources presented by User:onel5969. None of them (individually or collectively) impress me as meeting our requirements. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:45, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.