Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Mooney(DjPaq)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pat Mooney(DjPaq)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod reason states "Unable to find WP:RS to verify some of the claims herein." ⇒ Pickbothmanlol 22:32, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why this is being AfDed. Why not just let the PROD expire, if you agree with the deletion? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:27, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This page has been procedurally listed to begin today (26 November) as this nomination was not created correctly. This has now been fixed and the discussion will end 7 days from today. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:23, 26 November 2009 (UTC) [reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. allen四names 05:52, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my original prod2 (which is the deletion rationale stated above). No notability here. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:37, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Why the heck is this still here?~~ Delete This should've been CSD'd on sight as not-notable. Why must we keep "weak claim of importance" articles without proper citations? So, "Mr. King is the coolest guy in the world because 59,000,000 people subscribe to his blog." Oh, no! That's a weak claim of importance! Puh-lease. —Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!)^{What I Do} / _{What I Say} 07:49, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Snow Delete. Not a snowball's chance. Not notable.--Epeefleche (talk) 13:47, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.