Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Passfeed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:23, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Passfeed[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable. No English references. The Chinese references are advertisements which are not reliable. Hang9417 (talk) 08:31, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:47, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:47, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Article creator appears to be a single purpose account. Unable to find any sources in English, article may be appropriate for the Chinese(?) wikipedia. ― Padenton|✉ 14:56, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I vote delete simply because a news search didn't turn up anything in English, this very well may be notable but an editor who speaks whatever language it is that pops up when you reading it (which appears to be a Chinese perhaps I'm not a linguist by any means)Bryce Carmony (talk) 16:49, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.