Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pascagoula Abduction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pascagoula Abduction[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page for non-notable purported abduction experience. All references are either non WP:RS or are broken links. Simonm223 (talk) 19:41, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Simonm223 (talk) 19:46, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The existing article is terribly slanted toward the UFOlogy point of view, however a fair number of independent sources exist [1] including some critique [2] so it would not be difficult to WP:BLOWITUP and write an objective article using reliable sources. - LuckyLouie (talk) 20:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per LuckyLouie. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 20:52, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I agree with LuckyLouie. There do seem to be reliable sources available for this event, including this article from Boston.com, this article from Reuters, this article from the Associated Press. The story does seem to have attracted mainstream attention in reliable sources. With a bit of digging to find further reliable sources, a decent article could probably be written. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:05, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Article recently revised per above discussion [3]. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In light of the above discussion I'd withdraw my forwarding of the AfD and support keep Simonm223 (talk) 19:41, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.