Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parthajeet Sarma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 00:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Parthajeet Sarma[edit]

Parthajeet Sarma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP whose only sources are profile sites (LinkedIn, Goodreads, Changemakers) and thus woefully undersourced. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I agree with nom. Lacks reliable independent sources to establish notability under WP:GNG and fails to state a reason why notability should be presumed in lieu of sources under WP:ANYBIO. Sources cited are all primary and/or questionable and thus, unhelpful. Googling turned up nothing useful. Msnicki (talk) 19:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Serious tone issues, lack of available sources to establish notability. --j⚛e deckertalk 00:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.