Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parnia Porsche

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 12:29, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Parnia Porsche[edit]

Parnia Porsche (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable boxer - does not meet WP:NBOX Peter Rehse (talk) 09:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:40, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:40, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:NBOX and WP:GNG. Nothing to show notability as a boxer and coverage is mainly routine sports reporting, from her sponsors, or social media.Mdtemp (talk) 15:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It's quite clear WP:NBOX is not met. I also don't believe WP:ENTERTAINER, which covers models and celebrities, is met--although some might argue that appearing in Maxim shows/generates notability. My apathy, and hence lack of knowledge, about the entertainment business and pop culture means I don't feel real comfortable voting at this time. If I had to vote, and I don't, I'd be leaning towards delete. Papaursa (talk) 01:42, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:48, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.