Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parkside Church

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Alistair Begg. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-28 14:36Z

Parkside Church[edit]

~~Delete~~ Delete or merge non notable, non verifiable per WP:CHURCH. However, the pastor has a Wikipedia article, so I would support the merge into his article. Adam Riley ^Talk 18:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment WP:CHURCH has a number of conflicting proposals, no consensus, and substantial objections. So, I don't know why you are citing it here. Which of the views expressed in that debate does this article fail?--Doc^g 15:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Church's pastor also has an article, and he at least seems to be notable if the church isn't. Perhaps the church's info should be merged to his article. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)} 21:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no need to remove info--Sandy Scott 18:45, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Majorly (Talk) 13:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't see evidence of notability for this local church. -- Bpmullins | Talk 22:43, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article lists no reason why this church is any more notable than the hundreds of other churches in the United States Citicat 04:38, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable and no reliable sources. Also reads as if a church official wrote it. --The Way 08:01, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep WP:CHURCH allows for an article about a church was was influencial via a notable minister. Would like to see more independent sources for the church. Edison 00:29, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.