Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pareiasauromorpha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:33, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pareiasauromorpha[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

More taxonomic vandalism from a user with a history of it. He's simply making up new taxonomies and editing WP to fit his views. HCA (talk) 13:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:45, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This one has been suggested by one author, L A Tsuji, in a 2012 paper and in two earlier works published in German, but it clearly has not taken hold (yet) and is in effect a non-notable neologism. Agricolae (talk) 21:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No reliable sources. jni (talk) 07:47, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.