Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paraverse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:24, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paraverse[edit]

Neologism. After a few Google searches, the only person who appears to use "Paraverse" in the context that it appears here (ie: not as a band name or in bad fanfic) is one "Peder Burgaard", who started and has been the only significant contributor to this article. As the idea of a "Paraverse" in this context is not more widespread, I think this falls under WP:NEO. In addition, there are some WP:OR issues with this article as well, as indicated by the phrase "The term was coined and put on Wikipedia by Mads Thimmer" Lankiveil 15:39, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:OR, WP:NEO, no reliable sources and a touch of vanity. In short, as per above.--Ispy1981 16:08, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. JJL 17:08, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Parallel Universe.--Edtropolis 17:08, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, that's a disambig page, is that kosher? Lankiveil 11:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per nom. If redirection is appropriate I'd lean more toward Virtual reality or Virtual world. --Bren ^talk 05:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.