Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parasparam-Serial

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Normally, with no discussion, I would close this as WP:SOFTDELETE, but given the copyright issues and history of repeated deletion under minor variations on the title, I'm going to call this a full delete. I am going to stop short of salting the title, however. Should it get recreated and the new version still doesn't pass muster, salting can always be done later. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:14, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Parasparam-Serial[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is at least the sixth time this article has been created, and the sixth time it consists of copyright-fringing text with no references to reliable sources. (Previous incarnations have been deleted and had their titles salted; see logs at [1] and [2]. The article at Parasparam now covers an unrelated film.) I had a go at finding reliable sources but wasn't successful. Unless someone more familiar with Malayalam TV can point to in-depth coverage on somewhere other than a blog or anonymous content farm, I think we need to delete and salt this version as well. Psychonaut (talk) 06:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari ^Hangout 13:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari ^Hangout 13:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:57, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@JzG, Ponyo, Gogo Dodo, Shirik, JamesBWatson, and Callanecc: You were all involved in the previous deletions. Perhaps you'd like to weigh in on this discussion? —Psychonaut (talk) 09:03, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.