Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parasolid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:24, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Parasolid[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page does not show notability, and has no references. It seems like it is nothing besides an advert for the company to sell this software. Tootitnbootit (talk) 17:31, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Clearly notable in having several book sources [1] [2][3][4][5]. The article also has a reference to an external RS, namely [6]. The article needs editing and improving, not deletion, per deletion policy. --Cyclopia ^talk 21:41, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Google scholar gets nearly 1,750 hits for this software (or for its associated file format), from a wide range of sources and fields, including many from refereed journals. –Syncategoremata (talk) 04:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.