Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paranormalproof

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. nn spam, COI Jimfbleak (talk) 06:30, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paranormalproof[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is basically a YouTube Channel but it isn't sufficiently notable for inclusion. Looking for Google hits is a bit tricky because "Paranormal Proof" is a fairly common phrase but if you add the name of the show's founder (either his first name Dacomb or his last name Bierton) searches come up empty. Pichpich (talk) 17:11, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Dschslava^Δxparlez moi 17:30, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as lacking assertion of significance. --bonadea contributions talk 18:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per above. Non notable, promotional and COI. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 19:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.