Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paperturn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 22:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paperturn[edit]

Paperturn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline G11 eligible article on a non notable organization that doesn’t satisfy WP:NCORP trying to use Wikipedia to promote their software. They lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them as a before search returns nothing tangible, only hits in unreliable user generated and self published sources. Celestina007 (talk) 17:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete PR garbage. Nothing notable found. Oaktree b (talk) 01:19, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There are not reliable sources which can make this organization meet WP:GNG. Grailcombs (talk) 14:49, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No good reliable sources; the article reads like an "About Us" page on an organization's website. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 15:08, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as pure promo fluff on an utterly non-notable product. Previously speedied as G11, so the COI editor (declared COI, but still) republishes this within days; to prevent that happening again, may be worth salting as well. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:16, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 19:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.