Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pancha Ganapati

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This doesn't mean the article shouldn't continue to be edited, improved, and expanded etc. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:20, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pancha Ganapati[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Festival created by a Hindu American guru, which is no notability outside his "church". No "significant coverage" by third-party references. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:43, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Mentioned by unrelated books, websites. Bladesmulti (talk) 18:28, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep,This page usefully advises curious readers of articles like this one that this holiday is not a traditional Hindu holiday. Far too many online sources uncritically represent this festival as a "Hindu" holiday without notifying readers of its recent Western provenance. This page remedies that, not least because Wikipedia articles show up at the top of Google search results. That's a useful encyclopedic function. Rinne na dTrosc (talk) 21:21, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:27, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Incubate. Seems to exist but the content is not suitable for an article entry. There has been plenty of text in it and if there is sufficient interest it can be improved. Gm545 (talk) 06:33, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.