Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pan American Society for Clinical Virology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per WP:CSD#G5 and the CCI on the creator. January (talk) 17:01, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pan American Society for Clinical Virology[edit]

Pan American Society for Clinical Virology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. The only independent mentions of this organization I can find are trivial: citations of papers presented at their conferences, listings of their conferences on calendars, and so on. The only remotely plausible reliable source, cited in the article, is Huising's history of the group. However, that's essentially a selfie since it was published in J. Clin. Virology, which is published by this organization. The fact that they find it appropriate to publish a history of the society in the society's own journal doesn't count for much.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 18:16, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 18:10, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 01:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.