Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamahaw Espesyal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:41, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pamahaw Espesyal[edit]

Pamahaw Espesyal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally non-notable TV program. Drmies (talk) 02:18, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. No claim of notability/no references -- which mirrors my own search. Other than social media, there were just some peripheral mentions. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 02:53, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 01:40, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:31, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The southern Fillipino equivalent of an American advertorial local TV show with a bunch of non-content filling time until the lunchtime variety shows come on. Filipino crufters; we don't need to catalog every show that appears on your local stations. Nate (chatter) 11:04, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, have not found any non-primary or non-secondary reliable sources that give the subject significant coverage; therefore the subject clearly fails WP:GNG.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.