Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pallavi Patil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 11:27, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pallavi Patil[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film actors are not given an automatic free pass over WP:BIO just because they exist — their ability to qualify for Wikipedia articles is determined by criteria at WP:ACTORBIO. The article claims the subject has appeared in several films but except one, none of the film has own WP page so I'm not sure if they are notable films at least by WP standards. So IMO fail to meet most relevant notability guideline WP:ACTORBIO. Search doesn't produce any coverage and substantial information in the independent RS about the person so apparently fails to meet basic GNG as well. There was no entry on MR WP until someone created it today therefore I cant see any significance. I would say Wikipedia:NotJustYet. Saqib (talk) 14:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.