Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palem Srikanth Reddy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:26, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Palem Srikanth Reddy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Well the blp prod was removed since it got refs, but this is a strange case as the articles creator keeps on changing this between the userspace and a article as well as a major COI. Wgolf (talk) 21:30, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Michig and Jerodlycett for this! Wgolf (talk) 21:36, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE Not notable, his company may just barely lick by, but not him. Jerod Lycett (talk) 21:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a non-notable autobiography. The user previously had various versions floating around as his user page, plus in his sandbox and in the draft namespace. I took one version to MfD in February; see Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Palem_Srikanth_Reddy. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 00:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Athomeinkobe-yeah I had to basically put this afd up since it kept on going back and forth from userspace to article and since someone decided to add refs this was the next step! Wgolf (talk) 00:18, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Per nom Educationtemple (talk) 19:54, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.