Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palandine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to A Stitch in Time (novel). – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Palandine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This fictional Star Trek character does not appear to be independently notable. Reliable sources independent of the subject have not discussed this character in sufficient detail for an article to be warranted. I am also nominating the following related articles for the same reason:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:08, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:08, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:08, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wow, and I thought I was finding the most un-notable Star Trek articles - you beat me by a long shot here. This is nothing but in-universe plot. Delete. (Heck, usually group nominations are problematic, but I doubt we will see a single keep vote here...). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:23, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ Naah, just kidding Merge all to the DS9 novel in which they appear. No RS found, not suitable to merge to a list of characters--those are intentionally limited to characters appearing more than in one fictional work. Jclemens (talk) 05:38, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:55, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge all to the DS9 novel in which they appear, per nominator and Jclemens. Aoba47 (talk) 14:45, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all to the DS9 novel as per above editors. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.