Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakorn Chatborirak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:29, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pakorn Chatborirak[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. There are just two references, one being a blog, and the other a link to an advertising video in which he may appear, but there is no evidence of coverage about him. (Note: A PROD notice was removed in July by an IP editor, who gave no reason for the removal.) JamesBWatson (talk) 13:34, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I agree that the current English article is a crawling abomination, but there are a host of references in the Thai language article that support notability. Stuartyeates (talk) 17:08, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give a few examples of the references in the Thai language article that support notability? (I trust you did check that they do so, and did not simply assume that, because there's a large number of them, they must show notability.) I have looked at a sample of them, with the aid of Google translation, and I am not convinced. There's this FaceBook page, which without even bothering with a translation, does not look remotely as though it would show notability, even if it were a reliable source, which of course it isn't. Then there's another FaceBook page. Then there's this one, which is not about Pakorn Chatborirak, and mentions him only in an incidental capacity. There are pages like this one, which may be a reliable source, but it's not clear to me that it is. And we have things like this, which at present is a dead link, so it's impossible to assess how much notability it would have conferred. I am willing to believe that there may be suitable sources, and if there are then I will happily withdraw the nomination, but you need to specify what they are, not just say that there are "a host" of them, without actually pointing to any of them. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:36, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider keep to this article again. Don't delete article for Pakorn Chatborirak. This article have updating for references about reliable data that I understand, link for references are english language only, or not? Jutathit (talk) 7:08, 10 October 2012

You can add references to Thai-language content, they don't have to be in English. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:25, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think that article for Pakorn Chatborirak have developing for quality and add link to references as soon as. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuktuktukjang (talk • contribs)

Keep. Article for Pakorn Chatborirak is adding to other references about him and I can removed frame of notification message on top this article, or not? Jutathit (talk) 13:19, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:19, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:19, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.