Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistan Christian Congress

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. SoWhy 07:07, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan Christian Congress[edit]

Pakistan Christian Congress (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage in WP:RS. Fails WP:ORG. Greenbörg (talk) 09:45, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:47, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:47, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • borderline A reasonable number of references to it, little to nothing talking about it (in English, anyway). Mangoe (talk) 16:54, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Notable as a lobbying group of Pakistani Christians, and has reasonable presence of sources on the web. Also mentioned and quoted in WP:RS books like [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] etc. Mar4d (talk) 05:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:48, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) (m) 04:40, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This looks like the deletion nomination is stating the fact that the article does not currently have independent reliable sources, not that the nominator performed wp:BEFORE about the existence of reliable sources. --doncram 05:08, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.