Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pak Sar Jamin Sad Bad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. T. Canens (talk) 04:39, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pak Sar Jamin Sad Bad[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The book is not so notable in Bangladesh, the book was published in 2003, since then the book is being neglected by a large portion of Bangladeshi educated men and women. In this Wiki page the given references are very weak about the book, enough information has not been given. TBF 93 (talk) (contributions) 07:09, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 May 31. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:21, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:50, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:50, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. The nominator's account was globally locked for long-term abuse shortly after this nomination. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:49, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. This is a bad faith nomination.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 21:27, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. the nominator's account is locked. Dead.rabbit (talk) 18:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.