Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Painting and Patronage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Patronage#Arts. There is no consensus that the article should be kept. Long-term unsourced. All !voters expressed support for redirection in some manner. (non-admin closure) Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:24, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Painting and Patronage[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is nothing to indicate that the subject is notable. The article has existed for 15 years, yet has no sources in it. A google search shows no substantive coverage. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 00:53, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:55, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:55, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:55, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Patronage#Arts. I was expecting a different type of article when I saw the title, something like Patronage#Arts or perhaps an article on a book like Painting and Patronage in Cologne 1300–1500. I don't think this is an organization that meets the notability guidelines of NCORP. BTW: Its name appears to be Painting & Patronage, not Painting and Patronage. Vexations (talk) 17:30, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:23, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A simple search returns some very few results about individual initiatives and virtually nothing covering the subject itself. If more is found, the article can be redone at a later date, but the subject does not seem to have attracted much external attention for now. A redirect can be recreated and discussed at RfD later if necessary. Avilich (talk) 22:36, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:16, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why was this relisted, so far consensus is not to keep Avilich (talk) 11:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Patronage#Arts. No sign of significant coverage of this program as an independent entity and it is doubtful that we would expect there to be such. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 13:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.