Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paid basher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Shill. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:00, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paid basher[edit]

Article with no rescuable content for a non-notable neologism Kcordina 12:51, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. eLNuko 14:46, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Writer seems to be trying to make a point; thus inherently NPOV. Plus, any article that generates that many banners ought to be deleted per se. Daniel Case 14:59, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Shill#Shills on message boards. Ewlyahoocom 17:01, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Ewlyahoocom. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-02-17 19:27Z
Delete. It's a biased dictionary definition. BrianGCrawfordMA 20:46, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If Plant (person) was in existence I would have recommended a redirect, but it's not so let's just delete it.--み使い Mitsukai 21:42, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Ewlyahoocom — Graibeard^(talk) 00:13, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Her Pegship 05:34, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.