Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Padgate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Padgate[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

plagiarism of article http://www.mediander.com/connects/491405/padgate/#!/topic/-/ NathanAllen (talk) 15:57, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to me that they have "plagiarised" us. There is a little "W" icon at the bottom of the expanded article that links back to our article. I suppose that's their subtle means of "attribution". wbm1058 (talk) 17:32, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per WBM - article could probably do with some love per the maintenance tags though. Artw (talk) 18:36, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and perhaps improve or instead Redirect to Warrington for now until there's better for its own article. SwisterTwister talk 05:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.