Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paddi Edwards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The sources given are highly questionable, but there are multiple objections to deletion and no one but the nominator in favor after two relists, so closing this as no consensus. RL0919 (talk) 14:54, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paddi Edwards[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR, with no major roles. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:44, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:12, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:12, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:12, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:14, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:14, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ceethekreator (talk) 09:04, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP: I think this article was nominated for deletion mistakenly because subject is notable actress. مضحرالعجایب (talk) 17:06, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -Nahal^(T) 11:21, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as this is a notable actress with sufficient global coverage. WikiAviator (talk) 11:31, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What global (or even local) coverage? IMDb does nothing to support notability, and ancestry.com even less. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:18, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep.Since I have added references 1 2, there are now references in the article. I am of the opinion that passes WP:GNG. She work multiple movie that time , i think probably notable actress.-Nahal^(T) 10:51, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.