Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Packetsquare

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:20, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Packetsquare[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. No significant coverage from reliable sources. I've also checked Google Books and Google Scholar. Article creator is one of the software authors (Vijay Mohan / Vijaymohanb4u (talk · contribs)). — Newslinger talk 17:26, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 17:26, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 17:26, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 17:26, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 17:26, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in independent references. The http://tcpreplay.synfin.net/ ref is an incidental mention. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Per nom, article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 09:08, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (talk) 07:24, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; cannot find any reliable sources. Enterprisey (talk!) 06:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete like above; there are no RS to prove notability. wumbolo ^^^ 10:08, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.