Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pablo Miller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 20:54, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo Miller[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

mostly 1-event WP:1E. This is a minor player in a big event. MartinezMD (talk) 16:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I object to deletion. Two other editors have contributed to the article since I started it. Given a little time, the article could become more comprehensive. The fact that Pablo Miller has been awarded an OBE suggests that he is a notable person. Mock wurzel soup (talk) 16:08, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:51, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:52, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep so far on the face of it, though I am willing to be persuaded otherwise upon further elucidation of the potential lack of appropriate encyclopedic material, or policy. In addition to this one event, which generated WP:SIGCOV, WP:ANYBIO's "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor" for the OBE applies here and lends weight to notability, though does not guarantee notability. -Lopifalko (talk) 09:47, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.