Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PSYCH-K

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:08, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PSYCH-K[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a non-notable and non-scientific psychotherapy technique. Rocksanddirt (talk) 23:43, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that this will not be deleted. The "scientific standards" that are used to criticize this, have not yet understood the impact of quantum physics, which started to be actually science in 1900 (to be exact: 1838 - Faraday, 1900 - Plank, 1905 - Einstein) For me i can hardly take any science serious, that bases medical decisions on a newtonian principle! I'd call these kinds of science "old-age science". There's a lot of people out there that use this method successfully, so I think that this is relevant. My Voice is for NOT delete. --Jojobader (talk) 09:38, 9 July 2010 (UTC) — Jojobader (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete Unsourced psychobabble. --MelanieN (talk) 03:40, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.