Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PRIZ-ONE
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:58, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
PRIZ-ONE[edit]
Non-notable graffiti artist, recreation of a deleted page, article also apears to be possible vanity as author and article are titled the same. Wildthing61476 19:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If at any time you took a moment to read anything written about this writer, you would not make that statement. A semi knowledgable person just has to google him to see his contribution to this type of media. Wereas, I googled you.... found nothing. I am not trying to say that you are not who and what you claim to be, that would be assuming and pretentious.
For a " Non-notable graffiti artist", he has been in the NY Times, in several on-line and off line magazines. In serveral documentaries and most recently, his artwork appeared in an internationally published Blackbook. And low and behold, all of this information is verifiable.
I intially created the page under a different username. As a new member, I was unaware of how to go about posting the article using PRIZ-ONE as the subject. I then created this username, not only to post the article the way I wanted it to be seen, but also to ensure that no one else had the username.
Please take a moment to view DJ Clayworth's talk page and read the brief discussion we had last night. As well as his answer to my query, before anything is assumed.PRIZ-ONE 20:42, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- comment If you wish to establish the notability of the artist, I suggest you link to those sources yourself. however, your choice of identical names to the artist does put a shadow of a doubt on it. Furthermore, the article itself is in need of severe cleanup. See Zephyr (graffiti artist) for an example of a better written article.FrozenPurpleCube 20:52, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Most of the Google hits that come up in a search do not relate to the graffiti artist. wikipediatrix 21:13, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Look under "graffiti PRIZ" and you will find the information on the artist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.85.149 (talk • contribs) 18:20, 19 September 2006
- Delete When doing the suggested search, I get one result. This article fails WP:BIO. Erechtheus 14:45, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Priz-One aka PRIZM is a notable writer (I.E. Graffiti artist). This stub should be part of Wikipedia. Erechtheus, this is not an article. Please note this was submitted as a WP:STUB and does not fail WP:BIO. "indeed the whole concept of notability is contentious". Google should not solely be used to validate notability and should only be viewed to approximate notability, see WP:GOOGLE. Salva veritate! Lerner
- Delete. While there are some assertions of notability here that might satisfy WP:BIO, they are not supported by any sources whatsoever, much less reliable third-party ones. Since no one here has been able to find sources either, despite some due diligence research, the article does not meet the non-negotiable requirements of WP:V. --Satori Son 16:54, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment
In reading your debate as whether to keep or delete this article, I have noted that the search criteria used by |Erechtheus]] was made in error. If you remove the "" you will find a much more larger search result.
The search I found at various results came up with a much larger result. As to the content being in the correct catagory, I am writing about a graff writer who has some notability. As explained previously, I am planning on expanding on the article to make it a much better bio than it is a the moment. My main concern was to clean it up by Wikipedia standards. Before any further debate, please view the search result I have listed so that a more consise determination is made. PRIZ-ONE 19:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.--Peta 04:14, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn per nom, TewfikTalk 20:22, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.