Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POV's and Counter POV's on India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:27, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV's and Counter POV's on India[edit]

Reads like an essay rather than an encyclopedia. Much of it seems to be original research. DJ Clayworth 21:39, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remember kids, the correct title is POVs and Counter-POVs on India, NO APOSTROPHES! ;P -- infinity0 17:17, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 14:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Crystall-ballish original research, not encyclopedic. Fan1967 16:49, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This material should be on a personal userpage and not a separate article. Green Giant 19:43, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. WP:NOR. Pepsidrinka 19:55, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unsalvageable. Fagstein 08:38, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. utcursch | talk 09:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete =Nichalp «Talk»= 05:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per first three letters Melchoir 09:10, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no original research DevanJedi 01:52, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge to the main article about Indian politics. -- infinity0 17:17, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.