Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PJ Collins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PJ Collins[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero notability here: leader of a super-fringe party with no individual coverage. The Drover's Wife (talk) 15:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:38, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:38, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unless this can be better improved, I'm not seeing much at this time. SwisterTwister talk 18:38, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - yes, nothing here. Doesn't come close to the relevant guidelines. Frickeg (talk) 21:36, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no independent coverage, fails the GNG. Don't think a redirect is necessary either. IgnorantArmies (talk) 11:26, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A leader of a minor fringe party can get into Wikipedia as a topic in their own right if enough reliable source coverage is present to get them over WP:GNG — but indeed, it's not a role that gets a person an automatic WP:NPOL pass, and this is parked on a single source. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 15:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with IgnorantArmies above, except to say that a redirect would not hurt too much as it is possible a reader may search for him. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 02:21, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Highest claim is as losing candidate to a state legislature, with 0.01% support. Doesn't seem to have enough independent third-party coverage to meet WP:GNG, but I didn't dive in too deeply. Maybe redirect to Arts Party, but that itself seems to be of uncertain notability under WP:GNG also. --Closeapple (talk) 13:34, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.