Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PHP Automobiles

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 00:52, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PHP Automobiles[edit]

PHP Automobiles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable automotive company. Fails WP:COMPANY. No significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 15:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I have not evaluated this against the claims in the nomination. However, it has significant content. If the result is "delete" I have a weak recommendation either "delete with option to refund to draft: provided it goes through a review process" OR "redirect to parent company PHP Family and lock, keeping history, with option to ask to have it moved to draft and go through review process later" so that 1) some content can be merged into parent company's article and 2) if and when the topic becomes notable, there is a ready-made starting place. Had this not been so highly influenced by a COI-editor, this would be a strong recommendation instead of a weak one. Again, this is NOT a "!vote" on whether to delete or not, only a "weak recommendation" of what to do if the eventual consensus is to delete. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 14:04, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete- Lacks coverage to pass WP:NCORP. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 09:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or redirect per nom. Time being redirect to its parent company would be better.Faizal batliwala (talk) 15:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.