Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PGDCM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. After being re-listed twice, there is no consensus to delete the article. (non-admin closure) Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 05:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PGDCM[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a non-notable diploma. Not a realistic redirect, the article is unreferenced, spammy, and I can't see how it satisfies GNG. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:43, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 19:36, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 05:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This is a notable diploma per How To Do Well In Gds And Interviews, Pratiyogita Darpan, Education World: The Human Development Magazine, and [1]. There are likely more, but I didn't search any further. SL93 (talk) 00:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.