Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PF94

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Geschichte (talk) 11:30, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PF94[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Created by an editor that has a history of disruptive edits Robynthehode (talk) 23:42, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Im really angry,I made that because i want to introduce everyone to the PF94 LeoKids123 (talk) 00:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you link us to some sources that demonstrate the importance of PF94? Spiderone 19:57, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know this is heavily irrelevant and archived but there I have no importance to deserve a wikipedia article. The kid (leokids) apparantly seems to have some sort of mental disorder (in the times i chatted with him, which was a bad idea) -Chazpelo (talk) 00:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Nonsensical and not notable, easily meets CSD criteria. Seacactus 13 (talk) 00:11, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete totally not notable and meets CSD criteria. The creator should try another Wiki or something. In the meantime, perhaps they get a friendly message on their talk page if they haven't already about why it's not OK to make these kinds of articles. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:34, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - not even an assertion of notability let alone evidence of it (A7 speedy) Spiderone 07:58, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dont Delete - I MADE THIS SO I CAN INTRODUCE EVERYONE TO PF94! LeoKids123 (talk) 14:23, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Per A7. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:34, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is now an A7 CSD on this as well. Surely one of these procedures is redundant? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:42, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.