Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PC Mobile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 10:22, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

PC Mobile[edit]

Non notable phone service. Not exactly the best of articles either. AeomMai 22:43, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

keep -- Yes, it is a notable phone service. Perhaps the article is not the best, but it can simply be classified as a stub. Although they are obviously not as big as Rogers or Fido, for example, they operate their own call center with several reps, and even I know of a dozen people who use their service. There is no reason that this should be deleted... Tingalex 14:39, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete reads like an advert but beyond that, it does NOT pass WP:V as in the article provides no sources. Where are their multiple reliable reputable independent third-party published sources? does it pass WP:CORP? If so, prove it. (which will help clean up the article). get rid of the avert pricing and plan information. --Brian_{(view my history)}/^{(How am I doing?)} 19:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the aritcle up a bit...removed the "aim to provide low fees" crap and changed some other stuff. However, I do not feel that removing the pricing informaiton is necessary. It is not stated in a biased way and shows no opinion of having good value. Any opinions?? Tingalex 21:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as insufficiently notable. No coverage by reliable, third-party published sources. -- Satori Son 06:57, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If it is not notable.....why not delete practically all of the MVNO companies; Petro-Canada Mobile, 7-11 Mobile, etc. Tingalex 21:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Failure to assert notability. If kept, stubify. Hardware and fees sections are entirely unencyclopedic. --- RockMFR 05:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If not candidate for deletion, it could be Merged into the main Pc article, if there is one.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.