Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PC Gamer Forum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete. The article would have applied to any forum. If anyone wants to merge something, let me know and I'll put a copy somewhere. —Wknight94 (talk) 04:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PC Gamer Forum[edit]

Article covering the forums on PC Gamer Magazine's website. Forum on its own is not signifcant enough to warrant a separate article. SubSeven 00:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, no assertion of notability. I tagged it. —EdGl 00:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per above. No notability claimed. Eusebeus 00:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to PC Gamer. Someone might conceivably look for an article by this name and should wind up somewhere. Newyorkbrad 01:39, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the article? There's no content to merge! :] A redirect, maybe... —EdGl 01:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, well, fair enough, but there's something written there; and while on first reading I agree with you there's not a great deal of article content, I'd rather have someone who knows a little more than I do about the subject-matter make the call on whether there's anything at all worth integrating before any redirect is implemented and the content is gone. It looks to me like the worthwhile content could be summarized in a sentence or two at most; but a sentence or two isn't quite nothing.... Not a big deal either way. Newyorkbrad 01:52, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's just that this article reeks of vanity. And wouldn't one type in "PC Gamer" before typing "PC Gamer Forum" in the search box? One can't just assume there's an article written on the forum, can they? Anything's possible, but I feel it's unlikely, so a redirect may not be appropriate (it might not hurt, either). —EdGl 02:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.