Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. 6803

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:11, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

P. 6803[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As I've explained in all my other nominations of this user's articles, this article has been padded with extraneous information about the surroundings. The references are spurious. The only reference is a blog entry by a climber who says "sometimes referred to as Sri Kailas West". The more notable peak Sri Kailash is 4kms away. No reliable references are available in established mountaineering literature and gazettes that attest to the notability of this geographical feature (except a climber who claims to have who found the peak through Google Earth). Not notable and fails WP:GEOLAND #4 MaysinFourty (talk) 07:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to the range, no? Hyperbolick (talk) 18:17, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND as there is no WP:SIGCOV of this topic whatsoever. After researching, this topic's most detailed source I could locate is one line in an obscure data list (on the eighth page) on a climbing fan club website. There is a significant height difference between "P 6803" in this article (22,320 ft) and this source (22,217 ft). A microscopic one line PDF list entry here exists for "Sri Kailash west". This topic just isn't notable or worth keeping in any form on Wikipedia. Newshunter12 (talk) 05:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Kadzi   (talk) 20:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not Notable as per nom and Newshunter12. The first ascent article is interesting, but not notable. Searching Google and Google Books for "Sri Kailash west" yields only references to this article. Searching for "P 6803 peak" has more hits, but I only saw list results. Cxbrx (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.